Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Lots of Little Things

14 comments
***

The Eagles have a rookie camp going on this week.  There isn't any huge news, but here are some nuggets of possible interest:

* Macho Harris is playing CB.

* Nate Allen is playing FS and looks healthy.

* Marlin Jackson participated.  He moved well at times, but still looked tentative at other times.  (updated from earlier comment)

* Max Jean-Gillis is participating.  You may recall that he missed mini-camp while recovering from lap band surgery.  It'll be interesting to see what Max has to say.  

* LBs Moise Fokou and Joe Mays are there.  Some "young vets" are allowed in so they can get extra reps.


SPRINGS A TARGET?

The Pats cut CB Shawn Springs yesterday.  According to the Boston Herald, he failed a physical and that's why he was cut.  The Eagles need a CB and saw him plenty in his days with Washington.  Any interest?  Very doubtful.  Springs was brought in for a FA visit last year before he signed with New England.  The Eagles didn't make him an offer.  My understanding is that the Eagles were more curious than genuinely interested at that time.  After a mediocre year and failed physical it isn't likely that the team will be hot on his trail.  Some fans will wonder about passing on him, but really...is Springs a real answer or upgrade?  He used to be a terrific CB, but that a few years back.  He's now 35 years old.  You can bet that Pro Personnel Director Louis Riddick and his staff evaluated Springs this year.  If they truly feel he can help, the Eagles will go after him.  I just don't see that happening.  Springs might still be a big name, but he doesn't have the game to back it up anymore. 


OL HELP?

Tim Yotter of Vikings Update has a report up about OG Chester Pitts, who is currently rehabbing from a knee injury.  The Eagles are one of five teams to show interest in Pitts.  He played LT in college, but spent most of his time with the Texans at LG.  Solid veteran player, but nothing special.  Here's the key quote:

“I originally took three trips – Detroit, San Fran and Seattle – and they’re all actually still in the mix, and then Philly and Minnesota actually called last week and said, ‘If you’re ready on the 15th, we’re going to work you out and we have a place for you,’” Pitts told Sirius. “For me, I’m 85 percent, I’m pushing at 90 but I don’t like to say I’m at 90 because I’m not quite there yet. But I’ll be 100 percent (in) probably six weeks. So I have about a two-week cushion to get it as healthy and get as strong as I can get it.”


Pitts indicated that Seattle is probably in the lead for his services.  Interesting that the Eagles are checking him out.  With uncertainty about Max and his surgery, the Eagles would probably like to have an insurance policy in place. 


MORE CHALK TALK

Les Bowen posted some more nuggets from the recent Chalk Talk with the Eagles coaches.  Some interesting stuff. 
_

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

New Addition

10 comments
***

The Eagles added a rookie FA on Monday. They signed DT Boo Robinson from Wake Forest. Here is the PE.com blurb:

Robinson, a rookie free agent, was signed to a three-year deal today. The 6-1, 295-pound Robinson had 145 tackles and 12.5 sacks in his college career. A three-year starter, Robinson earned All-ACC honorable mention accolades following his junior year in 2008 after amassing six sacks.

A native of Monroe, La., Robinson was a three-year All-American scholar at Richwood HS and was a member of the National Society of High School scholars.

I watched Boo in several games this year. He didn't particularly impress me. There are reports that a back issue hindered his performance. With that in mind, I popped in a 2008 game tape to re-check him.

Boo might be the most unique DT in the draft class. He generally plays NT. He gets down in a 4-point stance. At the snap he comes off the ball, but very much under control. He uses his hands to engage the blocker and then Boo stops. He starts looking for the football and then takes off in pursuit. Essentially, it was like watching a LB play NT. Very odd. Boo has a medium athletic build. Heck, he almost looks skinny. He lacks the lower body size or power to effectively push the pocket. He does have a strong upper body and uses his hands well. He did 33 reps at his Pro Day, according to Gil Brandt's report. Boo has some quickness off the ball, but he really needs to time the snap right to be disruptive. He does play with good leverage. He has a good motor.

Boo is in no-man's land. He lacks the size to be a 2-gap player, but also lacks the athleticism to be an upfield, disruptive force. The Eagles likely were interested because of the way he uses his hands and shows potential at shedding blocks. I see him as a camp body with limited potential. I am curious to see how he fares in a more conventional style of DT play. It could be that he was miscast in the way that Wake Forest used him.


NEW COLUMN

Last week I wrote about Sean McDermott and the 3-4. I revisited that topic and expanded my thoughts for PE.com.

-Link-
__

Monday, May 17, 2010

The Eagles Book Club

20 comments
***

Today we veer off track a little bit.  We're going to set aside the current Eagles team to talk about a book.  I'm sure most of you would love to know my thoughts on the latest Danielle Steele novel, but that will have to wait.  Instead we're talking about a brand new book called Bury Me In My Jersey:  A Memoir of My Father, Football, And Philly.  The author happens to be a friend of mine, Tom McAllister.  He is a regular poster on the Eagles Message Board.  You may know him there as swamistubbs.

Some of you may wonder why you should care about Tom's book.  Tom is a gifted writer.  I've read a couple of chapters and it is excellent.   His story involves 2 of the 3 keys to a good life - family and Eagles football (PBR is #3).  The book isn't about his take on the team, but rather what it is like to be an Eagles fan, something we can all relate to.  There are a few long distance Eagles fans who read this blog.  I'm in that category.  This book offers a glimpse into what it is like to be an Eagles fan growing up in Philly.  Color me green with envy.  Kelly green, preferably.

As for the family aspects...that is just as interesting believe it or not.  Let me tell you a quick story.  I grew up watching Mazda Sports Look with Roy Firestone on ESPN in the mid-80s. Roy is the best sports interviewer I've ever seen. I loved watching his show.  Back then we didn't have the glut of sports coverage that we do today.  Getting to hear athletes talk was special.  I absolutely loved watching Roy every chance I got. 

One day in June I turned on the show and was greatly disappointed to see that his guest for the day was his dad. Father's Day was coming up that weekend and Roy wanted to honor his father.  Boring. Who cares about Roy's dad? I wanted an interview with someone famous like Robin Yount, Reggie Theus, or Todd Christensen.  Give me any successful athlete.  I was not happy to see an episode wasted like that.

Then something funny happened.  Roy started the interview and I was blown away. Listening to father and son talk about their relationship and sports was mesmerizing. They told the greatest stories. I was only a high school kid, but learned a great lesson. People are what makes sports special. That is true of the players who play the game. The people who coach the players. The people who cover the games. The fans who watch the games.  If a good writer can combine family and football, I'm all ears. 

I conducted a Q & A with Tom so that you can find out some more about him and his book.  Here goes: 

Q:  Let's start with some basics so people can get a feel for you.  How long have you been an Eagles fan?  Who is your favorite player?

The first season I really watched was 1991, the year Bryce Paup broke Randall's leg.  I'd kind of been on the periphery during previous seasons, half-watching games with my brother and my dad, but I didn't begin to understand what was happening until '91.  That year wasn't bad, but the Randall injury made it feel like a bit of a lost cause from day one.  The '92 season, though, is still one of my favorite seasons, since that was the first time I followed a team from preseason all the way through a playoff win.  I must have watched replays of that Eagles-Saints playoff games a hundred times growing up.

Favorite players:  I've always been a defense guy when it comes to favorite players.  Seth Joyner is one of my favorites all-time.  Loved William Thomas too.  Since sometime in '04, Sheldon Brown has been my favorite Eagle; I really admired the way he carried himself on gameday, his reliability, his candidness with the media, the whole package.  Now I'd say my top two are Trent Cole and Jason Avant.  The perfect attitudes for football players.

Q:  Your book is partially about what it meant to grow up in a family of Eagles fans.  Watching games was about football, but was also a family bonding experience, whether that was good, bad, or a mixture of both.  That makes me so jealous.  I grew up in a family of non-sports fans or passive sports fans.  Watching games was and remains an afterthought. Tell us about some of the "rites" of watching Eagles games with your family.

The routine has definitely evolved over the years.  Growing up, we didn't do anything special, necessarily, but we all had our assigned seats (Dad in the recliner, me in the couch nearest him, my brother next to me, then mom next to him) and wore our Eagles gear.   But there wasn't a big production like some people do, with the home theater, the big gameday meals, and everything else.  All my dad cared about was watching the game, which meant there wasn't a lot of talking, and when we did talk, it was to analyze a play.  My dad was a very analytical guy, not prone to the kind of emotional outbursts that I am. 

Now, I watch most of the games with my in-laws, which usually means seven or eight people, great food (we're all into cooking, so there's some competitiveness with the gameday menu), and more superstitions than I can list.  Last year, my father-in-law printed up the House Rules for Eagles games, and they're on display wherever we're watching.  My favorite rule: if something good happens for the Eagles when you're out of the room, you have to stay wherever you are until something goes wrong.  Once, this led to someone sitting in the bathroom for about forty minutes, until Matt Bryant hit that 62 yard field goal. 

Q:  You have referred to yourself as "obsessed with the Eagles".  Does your family think there is something strange about how much of a fan you are?  What about your wife?  Does she embrace your love of the Eagles or is that ever a point of contention between you two?

My wife and I have been dating since freshman year of college.  Back then, we had a mutual friend whose girlfriend hated sports, to the point that the girlfriend would actively root against Philly teams because she hated him watching the games.  I made it very clear to my girlfriend/wife then that I thought that was a pretty awful way to live.  She didn't have to love football the way I did, but she had to at least understand and not try to undermine it.

Thankfully, she's a sports fan too-- baseball and football especially.  She doesn't get nearly as intense as I do, but she watches every game as closely as everyone else in the room.  She has two sports-crazy brothers, so she's had a lot of experience with the emotions of game day.  In the past, we did have a few contentious moments, when I was admittedly going overboard, spending 8-10 hours a day on the Internet looking for Eagles info, breaking my toe kicking a table after the loss to Oakland in '02, leaving drunken voicemails for Drew Rosenhaus, that kind of stuff. 

Q:  I know that I've changed quite a bit over the years.  I used to live and die with each game in a way that would dictate how I felt for the coming week.  That's not healthy, but it is how strongly I felt about the Eagles.  With time I've learned to "just relax" a bit more.  I now see the big picture and I don't get too high or too low.  Has anything like that happened with you or do you still live and die each Sunday?  Have you changed at all as a fan?

Absolutely.  I started to hint at this one in the last answer; through high school, college, and even grad school, I had a lot of moments that, in hindsight, are pretty embarrassing: self-inflicted injuries, holes in drywall, fights during games, hurling beer at an opposing fan.  Dumb stuff.  I think it would have become a big problem between me and my wife, actually, if I hadn't grown out of that a bit.  But I've become much better at managing my emotion, especially on game day.  A loss used to ruin me for an entire week; a losing streak made me unbearable.  I still hate the losing, and some things will drive me crazy during the games, but usually I'm much better at talking myself off the ledge now. 

Q:  You and I first "met" on the Eagles Message Board (EMB).  I've had a hard time getting friends and family to get beyond the notion that a message board is more than a chat room of devious freaks and/or venomous fans.  Those types are certainly present, but there are also many good fans eager for discussion and an exchange of ideas.  Have you had the same experience in terms of people wondering why you care so much about a message board?

I joined the EMB about 10 years ago on a whim, looking for rumors on free agent visits, and never had any intention of posting, let alone becoming a part of the community for a decade.  But now there are people on that board who know a lot of personal details about my life (and I know about theirs), and who have been there with me through some important years in my life-- roughly age 17 to now, when I'm 28.  I'm sure if you could track down my old posts, it would be a pretty good way to chart my maturation and personality changes over the years.   

Still, there's that old stigma about meeting people over the Internet, and I get it, to an extent; it seems unnatural, maybe.  But the EMB is a way for 100,000 like-minded people to congregate and to know that, no matter what, there are other people out there who care about the same things as you, and who understand why you feel the way you do.  There's a lot of value to something like that.  Everyone's looking for a place where they feel like they belong; for me, for a long time, the only place where I felt that was the EMB.

Q:  Let's talk about the city of Philadelphia.  Many people are shocked to learn that I'm not from Philly.  Heck, I've only visited a few times.  I have loved the little time that I have been up there.  Tell me about Philly, as you see it.

Philly is a vastly underrated city.  For much of my life, I underrated it too.  It's easy to overlook its virtues, because, for such a big city Philly can really feel like a small town.  At times, that small-town feeling can be charming, because you always feel like you know somebody, but it can also make you feel claustrophobic and the city can seem pretty small-minded when everyone gets tunnel vision.  But that's a familiarity breeding contempt kind of situation.  If you let yourself get lost in that mindset, you can miss that Philly has a great independent music scene, a thriving arts culture, a lot of excellent restaurants, and really good beer.  And don't forget that fact that it's a living, evolving museum, with some of the most important landmarks in the country's history.  

I'm gushing a bit.  Philly's been home to me for most of my life, so I'm obviously biased on this, but I do love the city, and sometimes get irrationally defensive when people point out its flaws.  The way I see it, the imperfections -- the dirty and sometimes ugly streets, the occasional overt rudeness, the weird public transportation system, the violence, etc. – make the place more authentic.  There's an honesty and a shocking earnestness about this city.  Philadelphia is a place that wants to be loved and respected, and when it gets spurned (through failed sports teams, the mocking of the media, the dismissive waves of New Yorkers, etc.) it reacts bitterly, with a gargantuan chip on its shoulder.  I can see why people would focus on the ugliness that sometimes accompanies this attitude, but I think that's what gives us our charm. 

Q:  Was there any particular moment or event that led you to write the book?  What was your inspiration?

Two things:

1. I went to grad school for creative writing in Iowa City, IA.  One of my first nights there, I met a classmate who happened to be from central NJ and was a huge Philly sports fan.  This was back in August 2004, so we spent all night drinking cheap pitchers of beer (Tommy, I know you'll like this:  $1 pitchers, any beer, just about every night in Iowa City) talking about how amazing the season was going to be, how great TO was, etc.  The next time I saw him, he gave me the book Fever Pitch, which is Nick Hornby's memoir about being an obsessed Arsenal soccer fan.  He said something along the lines of “you should read this, and you should write your own version of this about Philly and the Eagles.”  I didn't take his advice then, but he'd planted the seeds.

2. Three years later, I saw Tra Thomas buying oranges in the supermarket, and semi-stalked him through the store.  Afterward, I was thinking about how weird it was that—while I was with my wife-- I followed this football player and looked into his cart to see what he was eating, then watched him to see what his car looked like.  It seemed pathological and sad and disappointing.  My life had come to being a part-time instructor at a couple colleges, not writing anything, and stalking football players in the produce aisle-- what a letdown.  So I decided to write an essay about it.  The essay was kind of a mess, but the friend who gave me Fever Pitch read it and insisted that this was exactly what I had to be doing all along.  He isolated the parts about the EMB and Philly and my dad and showed me how I'd just laid the foundation for a memoir really exploring why I care so much about the Eagles and what being a fan means to me.


Q:  The process of writing the book must have been one heck of a trip down memory lane.  What were some of the good memories?  How about the bad?

One thing I haven't really mentioned yet is that this book, in many ways, is an elegy for my dad, who died of cancer when I was 21, and who has had an enormous influence on me.  One of our great bonds was watching and talking about football, and so this book evolved from a reflection on my obsessions, to trying to unravel the roots, meanings, and effects of those obsessions.  All of which is a long way of saying that early in the process, I realized that this book required that I really analyze my relationship with my dad, so the most interesting part of this process was digging through family stories, photos, and documents to learn more about my dad, who he was before I was born, and how other people viewed him. 

The remembering really was an act of re-learning my own history, and better understanding our relationship, so that was all very revealing and interesting and rewarding.  It's impossible to undertake a project like this and not learn about yourself.

More directly, one of the best memories: going to my first game with my brother and my Dad and seeing the Eagles dismantle the John Elway Broncos, 30-0. In piecing together the details for the book, I learned that my Dad had worked a lot of overtime to be able to afford those tickets, because I'd been begging him for months to take me to a game.

Worst: the scenes where I'm in the hospital with my dad, naively thinking he's going to get better, but everyone else around us knows he's dying.  Had I realized the gravity of the situation, I'm sure our last conversation would not have been about Jerome McDougle.

Q:  What was your families reaction to the idea of the book?  Have they read the finished product?  Any reaction from them?

My wife is very reserved, and so the whole concept of being a character in a book terrified her a little bit.  But she read it (she proofreads the final drafts of everything I write) and saw that she had nothing to worry about; no one looks better in the book than she does, and I'm the one who stars in the lowest points.  Overall, though, she was extremely supportive.  I'd gotten an MFA in creative writing, but this was the first time I wrote anything I really cared about, so she was glad to see me finally doing something, instead of just talking about how someday I'm going to be a writer. 

The rest of my family hasn't read it yet, so I'm waiting now and hoping they think I did everyone justice in there.  The whole family, though, has been amazingly supportive of the project from the day I started until now when we're in the promotional process. 

Q:  Do you consider yourself somewhat of a typical fan and thus think the book is something that the families, girlfriends, and wives of fanatical Eagles fans should read to help them understand who they are dealing with?  We Eagles fans are a strange group at times.  Some would argue 24/7/365.

If this book does nothing else, I hope it gives people an honest look at what it means to be a devoted fan.  Sometimes it's entertaining, sometimes terribly sad, sometimes joyous, and often a mixture of all three.  Writing it made me really grapple with my reasons for caring so much about the Eagles, and I hope it translates onto the page; fans should enjoy it because sometimes they might see themselves, and friends/family of fans should enjoy it because they'll get an unfiltered insight into the mind and life of someone who cares way more than he probably should about football.
______________________

You can pre-order the book if you like.

-Link-

It is due for release on Tuesday.  Might make a good Father's Day gift. 

I have 2 requests.  First, buy a copy of Tom's book so we can show support for our fellow Eagles fan.  Second, please don't start calling me Oprah.  Unless I get her paycheck. 

Feel free to share your own stories in the comments section.  I didn't grow up in an Eagles family so all I can offer are some good sports bar tales. 
_

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Some Saturday Scheme Talk

6 comments
***

Let's talk about the 3-4 defense today.  Sean McDermott said in the Eagles Chalk Talk the other day that he may use it from time to time in 2010.  I don't recall us running a true 3-4 look at all last year.  I could be off on that, but nothing comes to mind.

People have a habit of mistaking a 3-man defensive line for a 3-4.  We use a 3-man line on a regular basis.  It is part of our Nickel and Dime packages.  The most common version is a 3-3-5 look we use.  That is 3 linemen, 3 linebackers, and 5 defensive backs. 

Why mix in some 3-4?  Basically, to give opposing QBs something else to have to deal with.  Throw an odd look at the QB in a key game and see if you can catch him off guard.  The Saints played a lot of 3-4 in the Super Bowl.  It didn't stop the Colts or Peyton Manning.  He still went 31-45-333.  The weird look did affect him.  He only threw one TD and the Colts only scored 17 points.  Clearly the Saints offense had a lot to do with that game because of their ability to sustain drives and keep Manning on the sideline.  Still, that defense wasn't what Peyton had planned for.  He focused on the Saints 4-3 base D.  Peyton is good enough as a QB to keep the chains moving when caught off guard, but 432 yards of offense only led to 17 points.  The 3-4 scheme had something to do with that.

Before you focus on the fact it was the 3-4 remember that the game before Peyton had shredded the Jets #1 defense and their 3-4 scheme.  He was 26-39-377 with 3 TDs and 30 points.  Peyton studied their game tape thoroughly and wasn't caught as off-guard.

The point isn't to run a 3-4 necessarily, but rather to mix up what you do.  We run a base 4-3 defense.  We do a lot of exotic stuff in Nickel and Dime packages.  The one way left for us to get creative is to adjust the base with some 3-4 looks.

How will we line up?  We can only guess at this point.  Here's a possible line-up:

RE  Brodrick Bunkley
NT  Antonio Dixon
LE  Trevor Laws
ROLB  Trent Cole
RILB  Moise Fokou
LILB  Stewart Bradley
LOLB  Juqua Parker (or Brandon Graham)

Dixon has the size and strength to be a good NT.  Bunk is athletic enough to push the pocket.  Laws played 3-4 DE as a Senior in college.  We could use Patt or Bunk at NT if wanted.  Abiamiri, if healthy, would be a good DE. 

Cole, Parker, and Graham would be the primary pass rushers.  They are athletic enough to drop back and cover as well.  You can't have the LBs rush upfield on every play.  You have to keep the QB guessing.

Bradley is clearly fine for ILB.  I put Fokou in the other spot.  I'm not sure Ernie Sims would be a good fit for ILB.  We could also put Akeem Jordan, Omar Gaither, or Joe Mays in that spot. 

OFFENSE

I need to write out a long post on the new offense.  There is a lot to consider.  We know the Eagles offense of Donovan McNabb as the QB.  We've seen Andy Reid and Marty Mornhinweg mix things up with different QBs on the field.  The question that we face this time around is what they will do with Kevin Kolb running the show.  He's not McNabb, but he is the chosen starter.  Other QBs were on the field due to injuries.  That forced the offense to change.  With Kolb as the starting QB by design we don't know what kind of an attack we'll see.

Anyone hoping for a significant change is going to be disappointed.  Andy and Marty are passing coaches.  We have a great set of pass catchers.  We will throw the ball.  That said, I do hold some hope that we will be more balanced.  I'll get into that more in the long post.

One thing to keep in mind in regard to the upcoming season...it will be a learning experience for the players, coaches, fans, and media.  The playbook will basically be the same, but the plays that we focus on will change somewhat.  And Kolb's execution of a given play will be different from McNabb.  Think of different musicians playing a set of notes.  Each guy will put his spin on things.  The sheet music doesn't change, but the music will sure sound different. 


ANSWERS

RE:  Vick trade?

Not likely.  I"m hearing real good things about Mike.  He looks completely different than he did last season.  Spending a year as part of a football team is apparently a better way to prepare than being at a half-way house.  We do need a quality backup QB.  It sounds like Vick has that role for 2010.  It is possible to deal him and then sign a vet QB to replace him.  I'm not so sure that's likely.  I don't think any team will give up much compensation for Vick.  That could change if he looks great in the preseason, but don't count on it.  Big Red loves his QBs.  He's only going to deal Vick if someone makes us a strong offer.  I don't anticipate that happening.


RE:  3-4 NT...have to be big?

We can be creative with our 4-3 looks.  Dallas used Jay Ratliff at NT and he's nothing like most of the big guys.  We could try any number of guys.  The closest thing we have to Ratliff in terms of size, build, and skill set is probably Victor.  And he has the mentality to be solid at NT for a limited amount of snaps per game.

I'm hearing that Daniel Te'o-Nesheim will play mostly DT this year in the Nickel and Dime.  He also could maybe get NT snaps in certain looks.  Teo certainly has the toughness and motor to hand the job.  I know some of you will focus on the lack of size.  When you mix in a special defensive package you don't need players with  standard size and a normal skill set.  After all, your goal is usually to do something different.  Remember, we're talking about mixing in some 3-4.  Could be 2 or 3 snaps or maybe 15-20.  This isn't the base defense that will be on the field for 30-40 snaps.
__

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Misc Stuff

11 comments
***

The Eagles held a Chalk Talk for local media on Tuesday evening.  Les Bowen wrote a post about for his blog.  It is definitely worth checking out.  Les came away impressed with Marty's knowledge of a highly complex offense.  He liked Bobby April.  He felt that Sean McDermott was the most useful of the 3 coaches.  He talked about various looks the team uses (4-3, Nickel/Dime stuff, some exotic looks and even some 3-4).  Sean also talked about several of the players. 

I spoke with someone else who attended and he agreed with the first assessment.  He also made mention that McDermott said Asante Samuel will tackle better this year.  I guess that is a point of emphasis with him this summer. 


FROM THE MOTHERSHIP

Dave wrote a good column on WR Chad Hall and his situation.  Chad is working his tail off for us part of the week and then flying back West to finish his obligation to the Air Force.  That's a heck of a commute.  I think you can see the dedication Hall has when you read the piece.   I really hope he plays well this summer.  I want this guy on the team, either active roster or Practice Squad. 

PE.com also has a video interview with King Dunlap.  He's added about 25 pounds this year, by design.  Juan Castillo and King planned for the bulking up.  King was thrown over to RT in the last mini-camp, but he indicated that was just done for that session.  He referred to it as a "numbers thing".  We'll see.  Could be that the return of Max at RG will push Fenuki Tupou back out to RT and that will send King to the left side. 

WESTY UPDATE

Brian Westbrook talked to the Rams.  He recently visited the Redskins.  Now he's on his way to Denver.  I'm guessing teams are doing research more than showing specific interest.  I still have torn feelings with Westy.  If he's truly healthy I want him to play.  I'm just not sure that's the case.  And I hate the thought of seeing him on the field as a pedestrian player.  Best of luck to him. 
___

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

DeSean Speaks

10 comments
***

There is quite a bit of talking going on by Eagles and former Eagles.  I didn't really get into the DeSean/Donovan spat because it was such a non-story.  DeSean said some things to pump up his current QB and the press ran with that as insults to McNabb.  Mole hill becomes mountain. 

Now DeSean is claiming that Marty Mornhinweg said some things to him questioning his toughness after DeSean missed a game with a concussion.  I have to believe this is a case of miscommunication.  With the way the NFL was so concussion-focused last year I find it hard to imagine that Marty would try to get DeSean to play by goading him.  Maybe I'm giving Marty too much credit.  Who knows.  Coaches can be a little insane when it comes to injured players.  Bottom line...this won't happen again.  You can bet someone from the league office will make a phone call or send a strong email to the Eagles to remind them how to handle concussions.   Coaches have been known to push players too hard at times.  There are times when they have to be reminded that players are human beings. 



FROM THE PEANUT GALLERY

One of the readers yesterday posted an alternate draft to what we actually did.  He based this on us staying at pick 24 and keeping our original selections.  arby put some work into this so I figured I'd offer a good response. 

Here the actual draft class:

1 - DE Brandon Graham
2 - FS Nate Allen
3 - DE Daniel Te'o-Nesheim
4 - CB Trevard Lindley
4 - LB Keenan Clayton
4 - QB Mike Kafka
4 - TE Clay Harbor
5 - DE/LB Ricky Sapp
5 - WR Riley Cooper
6 - RB Charles Scott
7 - DT Jeff Owens
7 - SS Kurt Coleman

Here is arby's alternate draft:

1 - CB Kyle Wilson
2 - FS Nate Allen
2 - LB Sean Lee
3 - DE Corey Wootton
3 - LB Navarro Bowman
4 - DT Geno Atkins
4 - DB A, Owusu-Ansah
6 - RB Charles Scott
7 - QB Zac Robinson
7 - SS Kurt Coleman

Here are arby's comments so that you can understand his thinking:

In my post-mock, the emphasis is on the secondary not the pass rush. I've chosen 10 players as opposed to 13. Except for the DE & QB, the mock has mostly higher ranked players at arguably greater need positions but we don't get our great pass rusher or our 5th WR or 4th TE but then I don't care about those 2 positions with what we already had. Yes, we need to rush the passer better but Atkins was giving Iupati fits during Senior week and Wooten if he returns to form was one of the top DE's of the class. DE & QB are 2 of the highest priority positions for all teams and we got quality players at those positions - hard to fault the team for that. I started to post this last week but decided not to, thinking it would be read as a complaint; now that the conversation has turned back to the draft, I thought I'd throw this out there. I understand why we did what we did - we wanted a game-changer type of player and I hope Graham is that. Then we went for quantity with the hope we get some winners and Sapp, Cooper, Scott and Coleman are all great value picks. I'm happy with our first 2 picks and happy with our last 3 rounds. But the 3rd and 4th produced some head scratchers IMHO. It seems the Eagles like to use the 3rd round for a little gambling which hasn't been very successful (except for Disco Stew). Obviously the Graham pick is key to this draft - giving up #70 & #87 and "forcing" us to trade out of #55 to "make up" for the lost picks.

I'm sure there are some of you that would prefer the 2nd group.  That is a good set of players.   Wilson would have pushed for the RCB job immediately.  Sean Lee would give us a great insurance policy at MLB and would also challenge for the WLB spot.  Wootton would give us our biggest LDE since Ray Rhodes draft bust of 1997.  Lots of talent and potential in the group. 

There is one slight flaw.  This set of players would not have done what we set out to do.   We wanted to beef up the pass rush.  That was project #1.  And maybe #2.  We wanted to build a deep group of talented, versatile pass rushers.  I've said this a few times and can't stress it enough.  There were only a handful of 4-3 pass rushers available in the whole draft.  There were a ton of good DTs.  Great group.  There were plenty of 3-4 DEs, big guys that have some athletic ability.  3-4 teams had a lot to choose from.  There were quite a few good 3-4 OLBs.  The one scarce DL group was 4-3 pass rushers.  You had to target a few players and go after them aggressively...if that was your main focus.  And it was for Howie and the Eagles. 

arby made good choices in his post-draft mock draft (first time I ever typed that phrase).  He took good players and got good value with his picks.  The problem is that he didn't really address the area that we focused on.  Wootton has struggled all year with his recovery from a nasty ACL tear.  He didn't play in the Senior Bowl or workout at the Combine.  There is no telling if he'll ever get back to 100%.  He is a run stuffer type for now, but you can't count on him as a pass rusher. 

As for Geno Atkins...he did play lights out at the Senior Bowl.  You have to understand that he was firing off the ball and going against Iupati at RG.  Mike played LG at Idaho and struggled all week when they moved him to the right side.  Atkins looked better than he actually is.  The matchup and game setting favored him heavily.  Besides, Trevor Laws was a better version of Atkins a couple years back.  We aren't a great fit for DTs that are 6'1, 290 anymore.  Daniel Te'o-Nesheim will play a lot of DT for us this year, ala Darren Howard.  We like our pass rushing DTs to be 270, not 290.  If we want a guy with more size we can just use Laws in that role. 

I wish we had been able to land a stud CB.  I hate the fact we didn't.  I did think going after the pass rushers was smart.  In my final mock draft for PE.com I had us take Jerry Hughes at pick 24.  I wanted a pass rusher more than anything.  Those guys have a dramatic impact on games.  Good CBs are important, but unless you have an elite player he isn't likely to be a game-changing force. 

As for the notion that the 3rd and 4th rounds had some head scratchers...I've already talked about Teo.  He will be a backup DE and will have a chance to play at lot at Nickel DT.  We use that role quite a bit in our scheme.  Don't think of him as just a backup DE.  Teo played Nickel DT on a regular basis at Washington so it isn't as if we're asking him to do something he can't. 

The 4th round featured 2 solid prospects (Lindley, Kafka) and 2 great athletes (Clayton, Harbor).  Kafka wasn't a reach at all.  I thought he could have gone in the 3rd.  Lindley was a reach based on what I thought, but not other NFL scouts.  I've heard good things about Trevard from the scouting community.  Most people feel that was a very solid pick. 

I had Harbor pegged as a round 5-7 guy.  Going in the late 4th is hardly a major stretch.  I was also hurt by the fact that I only saw him in one game and one all star game.  The Eagles studied him closely and thought he was easily worth a 4th round pick.  Why is Harbor here for us?  The offense is going to change.  We'll no longer be the mad bomber attack.  RAC yards are going to be a critical part of the offense.  That's an area where Harbor is very gifted.  He's fast, athletic, and elusive.  The other TE we really liked was Tony Moeaki, who also has great RAC ability.  Both guys can block and are good athletes.  Both should be good STers.  We passed on Moeaki, but jumped on Harbor in the late 4th. 

Keenan Clayton was the "oddest" of the 4th round picks.  As I said in his write-up "projects to Nickel LB in the NFL".  How do you value that role?  The Eagles feared losing him and made sure to take him somewhat early in the 4th.  This wasn't a player that they casually had interest in.  I liked Keenan a lot.  I just wasn't sure how to rate a guy that might not be starting material.  He could be an outstanding role player.  He's athletic and productive.  I love those qualities. 

arby talks about missing on some 3rd and 4th round picks. That is worth its own post or article.  The one thing I'll say that I like about these particular guys is that they are being brought here to do what they do.  Clayton is here to play in the Nickel defense.  He excelled in coverage at OU.  Harbor is here to be an athletic TE and backup.  We're not asking him to be a huge part of the offense.  He could grow into a role like that, but for now he should be in a good comfort zone.  That will allow him to adjust to the NFL easier and find his niche.  Kafka has time to develop and is in an offense that fits him.  Lindley has potential, but needs coaching.  We have Dick Jauron ready to teach him all spring and summer. 

I've been down on some previous picks.  Tony Hunt was a workhorse runner brought here to be a role player.  Dumb.  Max Jean-Gilles needed to go to a run offense.  Here he's asked to pass block 40+ times a game.  Dumb. 

The value might seem off from an outside perspective, but the 2010 prospects have a good combination of skill and athletic ability and just as important...they fit what we need them to do. 
___

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

New Column is Up

11 comments
***

I wrote about the LBs for PE.com.

-Link-


ANSWERS

RE:  Marlin Jackson at RCB

He absolutely could be the answer.  He's got good size and ability.  He's been a quality starting CB in the past.  I don't think we can count on him because of his knee issues.  Will he be 100% for 2010?  Can he stay healthy for the whole year?  He started all 16 games in 2007.  Since then he's only played in 11.  Playing CB isn't easy.  That position requires speed, quickness, skill, athleticism, and the right mentality.  If Jackson has lost anything in those areas he might be ineffective.  The ACLs could really affect his speed, quickness, and agility.  It could also affect the confidence he has in his legs and coverage ability.  We'll see how he does at Lehigh, but don't start counting chickens quite yet. 

One way to look at Marlin is as a lottery ticket.  If he can be a starting CB, we got a huge prize.  If he can be the starting FS, we got a good prize.  If he's able to be a role player, we got a prize.  If he busts...we're out our money.


RE:  Eagles draft board

The Eagles are too secretive to let that pictures of that thing get out.  I hear some things about past draft boards and share them when I can, but info on the current board is hard to come by.  The Cowboys board has gotten out a couple of times in the last few years.  At some point you have to start wondering if they are letting it out intentionally for a reason.


RE:  OJ Atogwe

He is not in a normal situation.  He was given the Franchise Tag last offseason.  That makes his situation unique.  It is complicated due to all of  the rules that govern RFAs, tenders, and Franchise players.  Most RFAs have a simple tender situation and they must sign.  Atogwe is an interesting situation.  I was surprised that no one talked to him earlier in the offseason.  If/when he becomes a true UFA it will be interesting to see if anyone goes after him or if there is an injury or some other issue that has scared teams away.  I think he's a pretty good player.


RE:  RCB

Myron suggested we could have gone after Dunta Robinson.  Maybe.  However, the Falcons were desperated for CB help.  They overpaid to get him.  We'd have had to outpay them to steal him away.  Dunta was terrific early in his career, but hasn't played at the same level in recent years.  I understand that the Falcons felt like they had to do something drastic and thusly went after him.  I don't think we were in the same situation.  Plus, as we've talked about many times in the past you want to avoid big dollar free agents as much as possible.  Those guys work out probably less than 50% of the time.  You need to make sure you're getting an elite player if you pay elite money.

As for staying at 24 and getting Kyle Wilson....we absolutely could have done that.  What pass rushers would we have been able to bring in?  There were only a handful of 4-3 pass rushers in the entire draft that were of any quality.  If you pass on Graham or someone in the 1st round you are going for a project later on.  I come from the school of drafting that says always take the pass rusher over the cornerback.  The DE can have significant impact on any given play.  He's there vs the run and pass.  The CB won't have that same impact.

As for Owusu-Ansah...he is a major project.  Myron says "the only thing really keeping him out of the first 2 rounds was the fact that he played in a small school against poor competition".  That's HUGE.  The only thing keeping Megan Fox from falling in love with me is the fact we've never hung out and listened to Jan Hammer together while drinking PBR.  Okay, maybe that's a poor analogy, but you get the point.  Sure AOA tested well and has a lot of potential, but he's never once in his life faced a legitimate NFL player.  Had he been able to play in the Shrine Game or Senior Bowl we'd have gotten to study him.  Watching him dominate at the D2 level is great, but doesn't make him a legit RCB target.  I thought AOA looked more like a FS from what I saw of him.


RE:  Howie's grade

I think you can give him a grade based on the moves he made.  Clearly we don't know how they will work.  We're judging his ability to handle the offseason and acquire players.  Howie was faced with some tough situations and circumstances, but came through it well and really impressed me.  We'll sit back 10 years from now and see how things worked out long term.  Do any of the draft picks become regular Pro Bowlers?  Does Ernie Sims thrive in our scheme?  Is Alex Hall the next Carlos Emmons or is he just a short term backup?  Who did we pass on in the draft?  And so on.

I like the moves Howie made.  We'll find out if they worked and how well they worked over time. 
___